Completion requirements
Predatory journals often invest in professionally designed websites. However, a closer look often exposes inconsistencies. The most common warning signs include:
a) Missing or unclear information
- Lack of a transparent imprint or legal disclosure (note: requirements may be less strict outside the EU!)
- Incomplete contact details (e.g., no physical address)
- No clear information about editors or editorial board members
- Vague descriptions of the peer-review process (e.g., “rapid review,” “fast acceptance”)
- Website content primarily targets authors rather than readers
- Past issues are difficult to access or not clearly archived
b) Overly aggressive marketing
- Unusually promotional language such as “Publish within 48 hours!”
- Banners promising extremely rapid publication
- Exaggerated claims such as “Global Impact” or “World-class Journal”
c) Unprofessional or inconsistent presentation
- Spelling or grammatical errors on the website
- Poor-quality or inappropriate logos
- Broken or non-functional links
- Inconsistent information regarding fees or submission deadlines
d) Implausibly broad scope
- Extremely wide disciplinary coverage (e.g., “Journal of Medicine, Engineering, Management and Social Sciences”)
- Combination of fields that do not typically align academically

Evaluating Scholarly Journals Infographic by Allen Press via FrontMatter (CC BY ND NC 3.0)
Last modified: Tuesday, 31 March 2026, 11:34 AM