Predatory journals often invest in professionally designed websites. However, a closer look often exposes inconsistencies. The most common warning signs include:

a) Missing or unclear information

  • Lack of a transparent imprint or legal disclosure (note: requirements may be less strict outside the EU!)
  • Incomplete contact details (e.g., no physical address)
  • No clear information about editors or editorial board members
  • Vague descriptions of the peer-review process (e.g., “rapid review,” “fast acceptance”)
  • Website content primarily targets authors rather than readers
  • Past issues are difficult to access or not clearly archived

b) Overly aggressive marketing

  • Unusually promotional language such as “Publish within 48 hours!”
  • Banners promising extremely rapid publication
  • Exaggerated claims such as “Global Impact” or “World-class Journal”

c) Unprofessional or inconsistent presentation

  • Spelling or grammatical errors on the website
  • Poor-quality or inappropriate logos
  • Broken or non-functional links
  • Inconsistent information regarding fees or submission deadlines

d) Implausibly broad scope

  • Extremely wide disciplinary coverage (e.g., “Journal of Medicine, Engineering, Management and Social Sciences”)
  • Combination of fields that do not typically align academically

Inforgrafik "Stop and Go" über Anzeichen für predatory publishing

Evaluating Scholarly Journals Infographic by Allen Press via FrontMatter (CC BY ND NC 3.0) 

Last modified: Tuesday, 31 March 2026, 11:34 AM